AI18 views6 minutes min read

AI in Coding Sparks Career Anxiety for CS Students

Computer science students are expressing concern that advanced AI capable of writing code could devalue their skills and increase competition in the tech job market.

Jessica Albright
By
Jessica Albright

Jessica Albright is an education technology correspondent for Neurozzio. She reports on the integration of emerging technologies like AI in educational systems, focusing on policy, classroom application, and student data privacy.

Author Profile
AI in Coding Sparks Career Anxiety for CS Students

Students pursuing computer science degrees are expressing growing concern over the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, particularly its ability to write original code. This development is causing many to question the long-term stability of a career path once considered a reliable route to financial security and professional success.

At universities like Brown, where computer science is among the most popular fields of study, students are now re-evaluating their career trajectories. They fear that AI could not only increase competition in the job market but also render some of their hard-earned skills obsolete before they even graduate.

Key Takeaways

  • Computer science students are concerned that AI's ability to write code will devalue their skills and increase job competition.
  • Some students are pursuing dual majors, combining computer science with fields like economics or considering law as a future career path to hedge against uncertainty.
  • Experts and faculty suggest that AI will shift the role of programmers towards supervision, creativity, and problem-solving when AI tools fail.
  • Universities are adapting their guidance, advising students to develop skills in using and adapting to AI tools, as employers may test for this proficiency.

Growing Anxiety in a Shifting Tech Landscape

The tech industry, long seen as a bastion of career stability, is undergoing a significant transformation. The rise of sophisticated AI models capable of generating functional code has introduced a new variable for aspiring software engineers and developers. This has led to a palpable sense of unease among the next generation of tech talent.

Nitin Sudarsanam, a computer science student, voiced his nervousness about this trend. He observed that even current professionals are changing their workflows. "People in the industry are personally coding less and using AI tools more," Sudarsanam noted, highlighting a fundamental shift in the day-to-day responsibilities of a coder.

This observation has led him to second-guess his choice of concentration. Initially drawn to computer science for its financial stability, he is now keeping his options open. Despite working on an internship developing AI agents, he is also considering a future in law as a potential alternative to a pure tech career.

A New Form of Competition

The impact of AI extends beyond skill replacement. According to Daniel Schiffman, another computer science student, AI tools have intensified competition for internships and jobs. He explained that these tools enable applicants to send out hundreds of applications with minimal effort, flooding recruiters and making it harder for individuals to stand out.

Dual Majors as a Career Hedge

To navigate this uncertain future, some students are diversifying their academic portfolios. By combining a technical degree with another field, they hope to build a more resilient and adaptable skill set. Sudarsanam is pursuing a second concentration in economics alongside computer science.

Samantha Friedler, who is also double-majoring in computer science and economics, shares similar concerns. She finds it discouraging that the skills acquired through an intense academic workload might not have the long-term value she once expected.

"Because it’s such an intense major, it’s discouraging to know that my skills that I’ve learned might not pay off in the long run," Friedler said. "AI can essentially do anything that somebody coming out of Brown with a (computer science) degree can do."

However, her second major provides a sense of security. "I would be more concerned if I was just a (computer science) major," she admitted. "Having economics really makes me feel that I have a background I can use." This strategy reflects a growing belief that interdisciplinary knowledge may be key to future-proofing a career.

A Shift in Skillset Not Obsolescence

While the anxiety is real, some students and educators see the rise of AI not as an end to programming jobs but as an evolution of the role. The consensus is that human oversight, creativity, and problem-solving will become even more critical. Daniel Schiffman suggested that AI could automate tedious and repetitive tasks, freeing up human workers to concentrate on more meaningful challenges.

"These tools could allow human workers to focus on more creative, impactful work," he explained. This perspective reframes AI as a powerful assistant rather than a replacement. The most valuable professionals will be those who can effectively leverage AI to enhance their productivity and tackle complex problems.

Positioned for the Future

According to Schiffman, computer science students are uniquely positioned to thrive in this new environment. "The people studying (computer science), who understand how websites work and who understand how powerful AI systems like ChatGPT work, will be the best-positioned people to use AI to be more productive," he added.

This sentiment suggests that a deep understanding of core computer science principles is necessary to manage, direct, and correct AI systems. The future may demand fewer manual coders but more 'AI wranglers' and system architects who can guide AI to produce desired outcomes.

University Response and Industry Adaptation

Educational institutions are taking notice of these concerns. The Department of Computer Science at Brown University has proactively compiled guidance for its students to help them navigate the changing landscape. Kathi Fisler, the department's director of undergraduate studies, confirmed the university is addressing the issue directly.

The advisory document prepares students for a new reality in the hiring process. It warns that some companies may require applicants to use AI tools during technical interviews. However, the focus isn't just on using the tool but on how a candidate reacts when it fails.

The document states that recruiters are looking for "how you adapt if the tool does not produce what you need." This highlights the continued importance of fundamental coding skills. When an AI-generated solution is flawed or incomplete, an employee must still possess the knowledge to identify the problem and write their own code to fix it.

Ultimately, while AI is set to redefine many roles within the tech industry, the need for human expertise in logic, design, and critical thinking remains. As Samantha Friedler concluded, computer science is "always going to be a relevant field regardless of AI, there will just be a shift towards AI systems." The challenge for the next generation is to adapt to that shift.